STUDIO-ONLINE

7/30/2010

Will He Kill Her, Or Will He Love Her?

Filed under: Books, Bookshelf, Film, mp — cindi @ 4:11 pm

darlingjim

Darling Jim by Christian Moerk (Holt pbk, 2010)

Reviewed by Cindi DI Marzo

Prophets and madmen use the same door to people’s hearts, don’t they? They always grab hold of your hope and start turning the handle until it gives, whether you want them to or not.

–A warning from Gatekeeper

Celtic mythology contains a mind-boggling cast of otherworldly spirits: good, bad, mischievous and those with irresistible charms marking them as tricksters and thieves. Such shapeshifters endanger all who encounter them on back roads and in the forests of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Cornwell, Brittany and Galicia. To many inhabitants in rural areas today, the voices of wee folk and Druids echo in unconscious creeds and consciously upheld superstitions. Still considered power places, standing stones in sacred circles draw natives, tourists and true believers.

Former Warner Bros. movie executive Christian Moerk set his first novel published in the States, Darling Jim, in one such locale, Castletownbere, a small fishing port in County Cork, Ireland. Sexy, leather-clad Jim Quick rides into town on a fiery red vintage motorcycle, initiating a chain of grisly events. His first victim: 24-year-old teacher Fiona Walsh, who falls head-over-heels for his implied danger, impish smile and x-ray eyes. A sensible girl when compared to her renegade younger sisters, twins Róisín and Aoife, Fiona can swear and drink the best of ‘em under the table. In the Irish language, “Fiona” means “fair”; Róisín, “Dark Rose” and Aoife, “joyful.” Their names sum up the girls’ physical features and obvious personality traits: Fiona the girl next door obsessed with Egyptian history; Róisín the tattooed loner addicted to shortwave radio; and Aoife the flower child earning her bread as taxi driver. Beneath the surface, each sister resists easy definition; just when you think you have their “type,” unexpected facets emerge. Fiercely loyal to each other, they share a finely tuned sense of justice. When push comes to shove, most who know the Walsh sisters would bet against their adversaries. That is, before Jim Quick arrives.

A foe equal to Walsh sister solidarity, Jim, as Fiona describes, “was a force of nature there’s no name for yet, unless that word is ruin, fury and seduction.” A male Shéhérazade, or seanchaí in Irish tradition, Jim’s storytelling finesse rivals his movie-star looks. Unlike the Persian queen from Richard Burton’s 1885 The Book of the Thousand Nights and a Night, though, Jim does not spin tales to preserve life. He creates intricate webs of malice, murder and mayhem. If Moerk’s novel sounds like yet another gothic thriller, it is–with a twist. Like Stieg Larsson’s The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and Carlos Ruiz Zafón’s Shadow of the Wind, Darling Jim surpasses genre and, with enough press and word-of-mouth, could rank among these predecessors on bestseller lists. In fact, Fiona, Róisín and Aoife are close cousins, separated by a few intervening countries, to Larsson heroine Lisbeth Salander. As strong women, they define Girl Power for the 21st century.

Raised in Copenhagen, Denmark, Moerk convincingly captures the quaint setting, quirky dialogue and prickly characters of small-town Ireland. His ability to write like an insider is one marvel among Darling Jim’s many wonders. While working for Warner Bros., Moerk traveled to Ireland to oversea shooting of Neil Jordan’s films Michael Collins and The Butcher Boy. (Jordan set his latest film, Ondine, in Castletownbere. For www.studio-online.com’s review of Ondine, click Film on the menu bar). In an essay closing the book, Moerk explains that Darling Jim germinated from three seeds: his visit Castletownbere, a village “spilling over with hidden stories”; a kid on an old motorcycle; and a newspaper reporting deaths of three women from County Kildare, apparently from starvation. Similarly, Moerk’s novel develops in layers, with diverse threads winding like twisting country roads through narrative accounts and diary entries. A master storyteller himself, Moerk reels in his audience with multiple perspectives and clues judiciously doled out like crumbs in the forest. Along with readers, the novel’s anti-hero Niall, an aspiring illustrator daylighting as a Dublin postal clerk, follows the trail. Niall believes that if he can draw the scenes related in Fiona’s and Róisín’s diaries, he might solve the many puzzles presented in them.

Moerk packs Darling Jim with fairy tale imagery (wolves lurking in the woods; a wicked stepmother figure; a wheel chair-bound wizard) and magical symbols (twins, keys, a bride). References to legendary figures old and new (Amenhotep, Jesus, Elvis, JFK, Tom Cruise, Obi-Wan Kenobi) and ubiquitous features of modern life (cigarette butts, phone cards, Hello Kitty stickers) have an unsettling effect, as if time stood still while barreling forward at breakneck speed.

Despite Gatekeeper’s warning broadcast by radio to a scheming Róisín, Moerk leaves little doubt about Jim Quick’s identity. Neither prophet or madman, Quick is a cold-blooded killer. The true mystery at the heart of Darling Jim pivots on a question as old as the hills. And the answer to it solves the greatest mystery of all: love. Fiona never stops wondering whether Jim will kill her or love her. It’s a fine line between love and violence, and she cannot fathom the distance.

Surprisingly, Moerk’s gothic tragedy spins gold from a rum deal. Although the cards are stacked against the Walsh sisters, readers should place their bets wisely.

6/12/2010

So That’s Where They Come From!

Filed under: Books, Bookshelf, mp — site admin @ 7:42 pm

flanimals

Flanimals Pop-Up

by Ricky Gervais, illustrated by Rob Steen, paper engineered by Richard Ferguson

Reviewed by Rob Rich

It’s easy to overlook many of the finer details when you initially set eyes upon Flanimals Pop-Up (Candlewick, 2010). The colorful and impossible creatures, virtually all of them hideous and literally popping off of the page, naturally demand more attention than the mere words contained within. So it would be understandable if someone were to begin flipping through its pages and lifting its various flaps until the irreverent humor and reader insults gave them pause. The natural reaction at this point would be to wonder, as I did, about who wrote such a thing. Then upon turning back to the front cover, it all makes sense. “Ah, Ricky Gervais. Makes sense.” But I’m getting ahead of myself.

Flanimals Pop-Up is less a story and more an encyclopedia for absurdly fictitious fauna. Almost akin to a wilderness guide written by a very irate man, but for the kind of wilderness found only in one’s own imagination. Aside from a notable pull-tab in the opening pages that directly mocks the reader, the book is full of sarcasm and in some cases questionably appropriate humor. This isn’t to say that Flanimals Pop-Up is completely inappropriate for children, but depending on the child in question it might be necessary for parents to read through it first and decide from there.

As for their ecology, it all seems rather pointless. Many of these unfortunate creatures serve no real purpose than to either eat or be food for another, and even then many of them serve no real purpose. Granted they don’t actually exist so it’s a bit of a moot point, but it’s difficult not to feel bad for some of the little guys. Especially the poor little Splunge, which typically explodes from fear the moment it’s born.

Like any pop-up book worth its salt, Flanimals Pop-Up is really all about Rob Steen’s creations and Richard Ferguson’s constructions. Steen takes an interesting approach to the illustration style of the various flanimals, opting for a kind of fake/realistic hybrid using an ink and digital technique. Many of these oddities appear almost believable and are wrinkly, warty or hairy in just the right ways, with only slight exaggerations to their forms to give them a bit of that cartoony feel. Some are cute, some gross, some are funny-looking and others are just plain creepy, but all of these little impossibilities has received a very obvious amount of TLC.

Every bit as impressive as the illustrations are their three-dimensional renditions. Just about every single flanimal crawls, leaps or skulks off the page. Even the small ones hidden beneath a simple flap contain large amounts of impressive technical work. Many of the larger creatures have a complete form that can be viewed from any angle. Often times I found myself holding the book flat and turning it over in order to get a better look at the current subject, and every single side was fully fleshed-out. It’s no exaggeration to say that Ferguson’s paper folding techniques rival those of most other pop-up books on the market.

Most people probably wouldn’t recognize Ricky Gervais as an author. In truth, he’s written several Flanimals titles including Flanimals (Penguin Group, 2004), Flanimals: The Day of Bletching (Faber Children’s books, 2008), More Flanimals (Faber Children’s Books, 2006) and Flanimals of the Deep (Faber and Faber, 2006), but he’s most well known for his role as an actor and comedian. Creator, director and star of the hit British comedy series The Office (for which he’s won six BAFTAs and two Golden Globe Awards) and lead in the fairly recent Invention of Lying, Gervais is currently one of England’s biggest names. Rob Steen has been the exclusive illustrator for Flanimals since the very first book. He’s also done a great deal of work for other titles, including illustrations for Afterlife, Volume 1 (TokyoPop, 2006) as well as co-authoring the graphic novel Elephantmen, Volume 2: Fatal Diseases (Image Comics, 2010) and Chronicles of Wormwood: The Last Enemy (Avatar Press, 2007). He lives in New York and continues to create creepy and wonderful illustrations for everything ranging from T-Shirts to pin-ups.

Flanimals Pop-Up isn’t really a book I’d say is “for kids.” Some of these creatures are cute, but some are pretty gross and could potentially scare the very young. Although most kids in the 6 to 8 years old range will probably get a kick out of all the icky-ness. Parents with a slightly twisted sense of humor or a love of that special kind of British sarcasm will also enjoy flipping through its pages and pulling on its various tabs and flaps. Just do it slowly so you don’t scare the Splunge. They could stain.

6/8/2010

The Greatest Show on Earth

Filed under: Art, ArtView, Books, Bookshelf, Reviews, mp — cindi @ 8:34 am

goldenchinld

The Golden Child by Penelope Fitzgerald

Reviewed by Cindi Di Marzo

Media hype surrounding the recently opened Tutankhamen and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs at New York City’s Discovery Center Times Square echoes the “Egypt-mania” coloring much of the 1970s. Viewing approximately 3,500-year-old Egyptian funerary art and artifacts displayed in a global tourist mecca is a bit unsettling but, in 21st-century America, anything might happen, including King Tut’s appearance at Disney World. In the 1970s some of the artifacts discovered in the 18th-century dynasty boy king’s tomb came West, once again since their discovery in 1922, first appearing at the British Museum in London for more than 1.6 million visitors.1 From there, the exhibit traveled to the former Soviet Union, Japan, France, Canada and West Germany. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York provided the U.S. venue, which ran from late 1976 to spring 1979. In America, more than 8 million people waited hours to see these gilded, priceless objects. As art works, they dazzled the eye; as cultural objects, they provided a glimpse of early human history far removed from the modern age. Initial reception to the Discovery Center’s show indicate that all things Tut continue to enthrall adults and children.

In 1977, English writer Penelope Fitzgerald reflected on art as entertainment in her first novel, The Golden Child. Although she began to publish at age 60, the Booker Prize-winning writer appears to have been born to the profession. Daughter of Punch editor Edmund Knox (1879-1958), Fitzgerald counted among other illustrious relatives her father’s brothers: crime writer Ronald Knox, cryptographer Dilly Knox and biblical scholar Wilfred Knox. Her aunt Winifred Peck was a novelist, and her stepmother daughter of Winnie-the-Pooh illustrator Ernest H. Shepard. From 1977 to 1985, Fitzgerald wrote eight novels filled with refined wit, ironic humor and incisive social commentary. For many of her settings, plots and characters, Fitzgerald drew on personal experiences as World War II correspondent for the BBC (Human Voices), drama school teacher (At Freddie’s), houseboat denizen (Offshore) and bookshop clerk (The Bookshop).

Before her death in 2000, Fitzgerald commented that she wrote The Golden Child for her husband, an Irish soldier, who was declining from a terminal illness. Set in an institution meant to recall the British Museum and its 1972 Egyptian exhibit, The Golden Child opens with an unforgettable scene: faceless crowds of men, women and school children on a queue circling the museum and park. Encouraged by newspaper headlines across the country, they wait to see the “golden treasure” of the Garamantes, an ancient race of Saharan desert dwellers. This trove consists of a young king’s relics and a cache of gilded toys for afterlife amusement. Securely ensconced in the museum’s upper reaches, their elderly eccentric discoverer, Sir William, refuses association with his 1913 find. Yet he expresses concern for the queues subjected to inflated entrance fees; freezing temperatures; and inferior refreshments and facilities. In return for their patient endurance, the queues receive a few moments to view the treasure. As efficient security staff keeps the ball rolling (and the queue moving) and curators seethe at the public’s intrusion on their hallowed halls, Fitzgerald manipulates the curators’ long-simmering fears, jealousies and ambitions into a well-plotted whodunit.

But in Fitzgerald’s hands, murder and mystery merely expose museum politics and human greed. Provoked by doubt of the treasure’s authenticity, the impeccably attired museum director sends a lowly exhibition planner named Waring Smith to consult an elusive Soviet authority. Not surprisingly, the Soviet regime has a stake in the treasure unearthed thousands of years ago in Central North Africa.2 Arranged by the director’s perfectly correct secretary, Waring Smith’s travel plans place him in a group of savvy tourists. Unlike him, they own winter-wear equal to sub-zero Moscow temperatures. Dodging their hostile stares and shivering through snow-laden streets, Waring Smith struggles with personal problems (mortgage, neglected wife, career potential). Meanwhile, his consciousness matures. Fitzgerald narrates his trip as something of a comic opera or visit to a hall of mirrors. He cannot fail to connect the queues outside his museum with endless lines of citizens waiting outside the Kremlin to view an embalmed Lenin; one night spent at the circus opens his eyes to the skewed perceptions of power and authority promoted from above: underneath their polished veneer, he realizes, the clowns lead the band. Dressed by the best London tailors, educated at Oxford and Cambridge, the men pulling the strings are fools. And in the hands of fools, power is dangerous.

Before the exhibit, Waring Smith knew his superiors to be capable of professional murder, never imagining that they can kill more than a reputation. Now summoned back to London, he realizes that Sir William and the odd-ball museum personnel he champions (a nap-prone, pregnant secretary; a devoted body guard; a conflict-promoting technician) are models of decency. Governments, museums and multinational corporations hope to gain pots of money and prestige from the treasure, but Sir William wants none of it.

Quiet and quirky, Fitzgerald’s novels are wonders of subtlety and wisdom. Their plots and characters reveal absurdities in the human condition hidden in plain sight. While it is easier to ignore our failings, it is far more entertaining to consider them played out in finely crafted fiction. In The Golden Child, the museum stands as one powerful element in a vast politically motivated chain. In truth, the Greatest Show on Earth is a human drama, and art an intangible given material form and driving the action.

1 The tomb was opened by English archeologist Howard Carter and his team in 1923.

2 Believed to be of Berber origin, the Garamantes of Southern Libya ruled the interior central part of North Africa from ca.500 BC to 500 AD.

6/2/2010

A Season of Smoke and Scarlatina

Filed under: Biographies, Books, Bookshelf, General, Poetry, Reviews, mp — cindi @ 1:54 pm

edickinson

The Secret Life Of Emily Dickinson by Jerome Charyn (Norton, 2010)

Reviewed by Cindi Di Marzo

In the mid-1990s, New York University libraries drew on the papers and printed books in its Jerome Charyn collection for an intriguing exhibit. With Master of Mythologies: The Fictional Worlds of Jerome Charyn, NYU spotlighted Charyn’s characteristic handling of his many and diverse subjects.1 Author of novels, memoirs, non-fiction, short stories, graphic novels, essays and reviews, Charyn revels in complexity. His portraits of people and places run deep; his interpretations of their histories, real and fictional, follow risky routes. Blending verifiable fact with emotional and psychological truths, accessed by him through great heart and imagination, Charyn creates worlds within worlds; like an archeologist, he sets forth to uncover entire civilizations teeming below the most benign exteriors.

One of the best examples is his recent rendering of Emily Dickinson, the beloved 19th-century New England poet. With The Secret Life of Emily Dickinson, Charyn goes far beyond accepted scholarship, however mythologized. His Dickinson is dearer, closer and more real than any painted in the standard biographies. She emerges from her own box of phantoms, animated by hunger, rage and disappointment. Her greatest passion is for people; her poems, the strongest card in her suit. Charyn’s Dickinson yearns for attention from, in her eyes, a few worthy contenders. In his novel, she is a lonely lightning rod held captive in the desert.2

In a 2007 interview with in Book Forum’s Kera Bolonik (http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/014_05/2081 Feb./March 2008), Charyn discussed the evolution of his 2008 novel, Johnny One-Eye, set during the American Revolution. The novel’s protagonist is George Washington’s bastard son. Charyn explained that Johnny One-Eye is something of an alter-ego for him:

“As a child, I was wishing that I was an orphan, that my father wasn’t my father. As horribly cruel as it is to say that, cruelty is sometimes your strongest weapon. Imagining George Washington as your father, that you are the bastard child of this extraordinary man, empowered me in writing it. I could find all the juice–the hostility, the anger–that was necessary to keep the story alive.”

Charyn gives readers a satisfying serving of “juice” in The Secret Life of Emily Dickinson. Here, she inhabits a number of identities challenging the image of a “mouse” who baked black cake for family and neighbors, scribbled poems with a pen kept dangling from her pocket, took refuge in her garden, and raised eyebrows with her odd behavior. Charyn ignites a profound metamorphosis in her as she changes from father’s “Dolly” living in the family’s Amherst home to the devil’s handmaiden boarding at Mount Holyoke Female Seminary. As she matures, Dickinson adopts many guises, among them: the ghost of Currer Bell (Charlotte Brontë pen name); Daisy the flower girl; a “kicking kangaroo”; a mourning Jumbo the circus elephant; the Queen Recluse; Antony to a line of cruel Cleopatras; and King Solomon. She roams Amherst’s streets and alleys after dark, searching for her lovers: an illiterate Mount Holyoke handyman she calls the Blond Assassin, and a rum-ruined rogue “Tutor from Mars” (actually, Yale) she calls her Domingo.

By day, she develops crushes on men and women we know from Dickinson biographies: father Edward, minister Charles Wadsworth, author Thomas Wentworth Higginson, editor Samuel Bowles, volatile sister-in-law Susan, author/editor Mabel Loomis Todd, and Judge Otis Lord. Thirsting for them as she does for her tattooed handyman and Domingo, she resents their desertions: father to his political career; Wadsworth to his preaching; Higginson to his criticism of her poems; Bowles to his family; Susan to her jealousy; and Lord to his rapacious niece.

Edward’s and Susan’s betrayals recur in different forms, best symbolized by his obsession with smoke and fires and her nursing of scarlatina (scarlet fever) patients. Dickinson cannot draw them with her “feathers” and “plumage.” They find heat elsewhere, and she cannot survive his indifference and her “siroccos.” Another masterful image, handyman Tom’s tattoo, reflects Dickinson’s emotional state. At first, she conventionally identifies the tattoo as a sign of love. Then, Tom tells her the design brands an orphan whose heart is blue and broken by pain.

Like Tom, two other fictional characters haunt Dickinson, a charity student at Holyoke named Zilpah Marsh, and the yellow-gloved Holyoke vice principal, Miss Rebecca Winslow. As one of society’s outcasts, Zilpah is free to be as dangerous as she desires, while as the daughter of an Amherst squire, Dickinson must live out her fantasies in visions and dreams. As Dickinson’s alter ego, Zilpah reveals a conflict quite evident in Dickinson’s letters; the poet believed in her scribblings but doubted the sanctity of her soul. Was she really Squire Dickinson’s good little daughter or a devil in disguise? Repeatedly vanquished by death–Edward, her mother, her young nephew Gib–Dickinson seized the promise of immortality. But the only relief she seems to find in Amherst comes from two loyal companions who never withdraw their support: sister Lavinia (who protects her poems) and her Newfoundland Carlo (who protects her person).

In Johnny One-Eye, a vivid Revolutionary-Era America grounds the riveting adventure. In The Secret Life of Emily Dickinson, the stolid Christian world of mid 19th-century Amherst is a chimera. Literally blinded by light, Dickinson suffered from an eye disorder acute during her most prolific period, a time when her box of phantoms erupted into words with wings. Charyn’s excavation of Dickinson’s phantoms is as startling as Dickinson’s poems, which invite readers to consider worlds contained on the head of a pin. Alive to the magic of her poetry, Charyn weaves a Dickinson mythology equal to his subject.

1 Author of more than 40 books, including a cult-status detective series featuring New York City policeman Isaac Sidel and three memoirs of his own Bronx childhood (The Dark Lady from Belorusse, The Black Swan and Bronx Boy), Charyn gave his personal papers to New York University libraries. Master of Mythologies: The Fictional Worlds of Jerome Charyn was held from October 31, 1995-February 1, 1996.

2 In addition to William Luce’s outstanding 1976 play The Belle of Amherst (available on DVD), other fascinating takes on the poet’s life and work include Dickinson scholar Judith Farr’s 1996 novel I Never Came to You in White; Joyce Carol Oates’s 2008 Wild Nights!: Stories About the Last Days of Poe, Dickinson, Twain, James and Hemingway; two delightful children’s books (The Mouse of Amherst by Elizabeth Spires, illustrated by Claire A. Nivola, and Emily by Michaed Bedard, illustrated by Barbara Cooney); and biographer Lyndall Gordon’s 2010 Lives like Loaded Guns: Dickinson and Her Family’s Feuds.

For spring 2010, the New York Botanical Garden has staged a lovely evocation of Dickinson as gardener. For more information, go to: www.nybg.org

5/12/2010

Before One Can Forget, One Must Learn

Filed under: Books, Bookshelf, mp — site admin @ 11:22 am

thingamabob

The Thingamabob

by Il Sung Na

Reviewed by Rob Rich

What is this thing? Can you eat it? No. Does it fly? Nope. Can it be used to dig? Not very well. It’s the classic process of elimination kids (and even people in general) tend to go through when they stumble upon an unknown object they’ve never seen before. They’ll test its properties, one by one, until they reach a satisfactory conclusion. It’s this process which is at the heart of Il Sung Na’s The Thingamabob (Knopf Books for Young Readers, 2010).

When an elephant (referred to only as “he” and “him”) finds a red umbrella, his curiosity is piqued and he decides to figure out just what this “thingamabob” is. He asks his friends, but being animals themselves they’re just as clueless as he is. Undaunted, he begins to test its aptitude for various tasks. He tries to use it to fly, but unsurprisingly that doesn’t work. He tries to hide behind it, but he’s much too large for it to cover him. He even tries to use it as a boat, which doesn’t last long. Eventually it begins to rain, and as the first drops bounce off of his hide the usefulness of this curious object finally dawns on him. Raising the umbrella over his head with his trunk, he’s soon joined by his friends. They all crowd together and manage to stay dry, thanks to his timely discovery.

As cute and timeless as the story in The Thingamabob is, it’s the artwork that really sets it apart. Na flawlessly compiles “painterly” textures and digital layers in Photoshop for a striking effect. There’s some very beautiful work with paint textures throughout the book, with grass looking decidedly “grassy,” water appearing to ebb and flow and so on. Hidden within most of this fantastic texture work are small patterns and even a few seemingly hidden images. “His” tough, elephantine hide displays a number of gentle curves and swirls, and a small bird can even be found hiding in the pattern for a couple of pages. The kangaroo has a small heart hidden in her fur, and even the birds sport some playful lines in their feathers.

The visual style is very colorful and whimsical. Even the mundane feels vibrant. It’s not often that one could claim the dirt practically leaps off of the page. Sprinkled liberally throughout the story are some very clever visual touches. The aforementioned use of lines and textures are the most immediately noticeable, but by looking a little closer even more subtle touches come to light. When the rain begins to fall, Na incorporates a very clever technique of “washing-out” rings of varying sizes throughout the bird’s-eye-view illustration. It’s not a detail that jumps out immediately, but it translates to a very simple yet ingenious visualization of seeing rain fall from above. However, the most impressive visual tricks I noticed were Na’s incorporations of a given mood into the environment. When he first discovers the umbrella, the ground is very loopy and twisted to show his confusion. When he opens the umbrella for the first time and it opens with a sudden “pop,” the ground becomes jagged and spiked along with his initial shock. I found myself flipping through the book many, many times trying to spot more of Na’s subtle visuals, and I’m positive there are still plenty more to be discovered.

As with The Thingamabob, Il Sung Na’s debut title, A Book of Sleep (Knopf Books for Young Readers, 2009), was also single-handedly written and illustrated. And, just like The Thingamabob, A Book of Sleep is filled with all manner of cute and fantastic illustrations that are just as whimsical and subtly complex. Na was born in Seoul, but has studied and worked in London. He’s also received several awards throughout his career, including a nomination for the British Book Design and Production Awards for A Book of Sleep, a selection for the New Talent category by the Association of Illustrators and a nomination for a Best New Illustrators Award.

The Thingamabob is one of those rare books that speaks to both children and adults without being “preachy” or obvious. We’ve all done the “What Is It?” dance at least a few times in out lives, but even without that connection there’s plenty of enjoyment to be found as the elephant clumsily deduces the intended function of this weird contraption. It’s a story that can be read over and over, with drawings that can be scrutinized for hours. A cute, humorous tale for all ages.

5/3/2010

Unlocking the Mystery of a Simple Man’s Genius

Filed under: Art, ArtView, Biographies, Books, Bookshelf, General, Reviews, mp — cindi @ 4:37 pm

gaudi

The Gaudí Key by Esteban Martín and Andreu Carranza (Morrow, 2008; Harper pbk, 2009)

Reviewed by Cindi Di Marzo

When Catalan modernist architect Antonio Gaudí died in 1926, not only did he leave his Sagrada Família, a cathedral of vast scope, design and symbolism, unfinished; a labyrinthine trail of imagery, allusions and historical references remains for admirers of his peculiar rendering of neo-gothic style to decipher. Gaudí reviled Renaissance ideals of symmetry and regularity. Gothic religious architecture was conceived to be a mirror of the cosmos, as well as a book of stone meant to be read by the faithful. Messages conveyed in stone directed worshippers to truths too precious to be laid bare before the blind, ignorant or blatantly evil. Elaborate weavings of ancient myth and legend, classical philosophy, medieval theology, zoology, nature and occult mysticism might appear within Christian narratives set in stone. Gaudí’s unfinished masterpiece contains all of these and more. Scholars and aesthetic detectives will continue to conjecture, theorize, project and, of course, argue amongst themselves while, ultimately, Gaudí’s work resists definitive interpretation.

Gaudí’s fierce defense of his Catalan heritage and traditional Catalan styles anchors his work. From Moorish and oriental motifs, European art nouveau and ideas promoted by architects at home and abroad (e.g., 19th-century French architect Eugène Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc), Gaudí absorbed a prodigious number of influences. He filtered these through his personal, essentially medieval Christian worldview to construct buildings mirroring God’s creation; his aim, to become God’s architect on earth. Certainly, a lofty goal but this giant of an artist was a simple man. Dressing like a pauper, living in his studio, toiling with few breaks and even fewer conveniences, Gaudí dedicated his life to his work and, in his later years, his work to his God.

For readers eager for an exhilarating (and exhausting) ride through Gaudí’s Barcelona, a good place to start is Esteban Martín and Andreu Carranza hair-raising thriller, The Gaudí Key. The authors have made fiction a cauldron in which they stir a heady mixture of fact, fantasy, history and mystery. Although most reviewers have compared The Gaudí Key to Dan Brown’s 2003 blockbuster, The Da Vinci Code, it seems more accurate to place it with Catalan author Carlos Ruiz Zafón’s work. Like Angel’s Game, Zafón’s follow-up to his outstanding Shadow of the Wind, The Gaudí Key is a bit too ambitious. At times, multiple plots spin off, diverting the pace. Still, fascinating considerations of, for example, the Catalan Renaixença, Zeno’s Paradoxes, the Garden of Hesperides, suiseka (the Japanese art of stones), fractal mathematics, ancient Christian societies and an elusive alchemist known as Fulcanelli provide the novel’s high points. The places at which Gaudí’s life merges with these discourses might cause eyebrows to raise and heart rates to rise; in the instance of Fulcanelli, the alchemist disappeared in 1926, the year Gaudí died, and during her childhood María, the main character, read one of Fulcanelli’s critical works, Le Mystère des Cathédrales (The Mystery of the Cathedrals), published in Paris in–you guessed it–1926.

Adept at layering recurring symbols, Martín and Carranza orchestrate echoes that will leave many readers incredulous at Gaudí’s genius. Numerical symbols include the number seven (knights, Greek letters, riddles, buildings). Other types of imagery pop up time and again: animals (tortoises, pelicans); flowers and plants (sunflowers and mushrooms); shapes (circles, squares, stars, crosses, pentagrams), fairy tales (breadcrumb trails, enchanted houses) and maps (Barcelona, Ursa Major, one on María’s skin). As with Gaudí’s cathedral, this trove of sign and symbol masks a simple idea. Martín and Carranza suggest that, as guardian of Christ’s cornerstone, Gaudí was murdered rather than victim of a streetcar accident. Committed by the Corbel, the name of an evil society (as well as an architectural term), represented on the facade of Sagrada Família by a demon holding a bomb, the murder has been repeated 80 years later with the death of Gaudí’s now elderly apprentice. Next in line is the apprentice’s granddaughter, María. She and her lover, Miguel, have six days (echoing the six directions and six days in which God created the world) to find the place where Gaudí hid the 300-year-old relic. Between gruesome murders, María and Miguel accept their destiny as saviors of Christendom and life partners.

The English-language translation of the original, written in Catalan, lacks Gaudí’s flourish, but competently propels the many narrative threads. More felicitous, descriptions of seven Gaudí projects holding clues for María–Casa Vicens, Parc Güell, Sagrada Família, La Pedrera, Casa Batlló, Casa Calvet and Palacio Güell–have force and clarity. If not entirely successful as a thriller, The Gaudí Key succeeds as a bow to a gifted son of cauldron-makers whose vessels of stone contain mystical worlds yet to be revealed. By suspending disbelief, readers will be enthralled as they are caught in Martín and Carranza’s intricate gothic web.

4/25/2010

Pets Are the Darndest Things

Filed under: Art, Books, Bookshelf, mp — site admin @ 7:47 am

bestpetever

The Best Pet Ever

by Victoria Roberts, illustrated by Deborah Allwright

Reviewed by Rob Rich

We’ve all done it. We’ve all used our imaginations to conjure up a special companion in our youth, whether it was an imaginary friend or an imaginary pet (and really, what is a pet to a child but a friend?). The little girl in Victoria Roberts’ The Best Pet Ever (Tiger Tales, 2009) is no exception. On what appears to be a normal trip to or from some form of store, she and her mother end up passing by a pet shop. Seeing all the adorable animals staring out at her through the storefront (although I have to question the validity of seeing a pony in a pet shop window), the little girl promptly begins that age-old battle of wills against her parent.

Mom, can I have a pet?

Please?

Mom, Mom, can I?

Can I have a pet?”

We’ll see.

Not content to wait, (and really, what child ever is?) the little girl takes it upon herself to find her own pet. She finds a rock on the ground, and wasting no time she ties a rope around it and names him Fluffy. Much like any young child, she takes Fluffy everywhere. They go for walks, play and so on. After a couple of days, Fluffy’s “leash” breaks and he tumbles down a hillside. So, much like any young child, the little girl finds a new pet.

A wool glove named Nibbles, a candy wrapper named Swishy and even a balloon named Bruce. Each one is, in turn, her most trusted and well-loved pet. Each one, in turn, is The Best Pet Ever. And each one, in turn, eventually causes her to lose interest. As the little girl begins to run out of found objects (and patience), she continues to try and coax some form of animal companion out of her mother.

Of course, as distraught as the little girl may seem, it’s fairly obvious that Mom is up to something. Every time she’s questioned she has the same patient response: “We’ll see.” Finally, when the little girl is ready to give up, her mother shows her a cardboard box. When the box is opened, the little girl meets Timmy, a cute little black and white kitten. As she holds Timmy for the first time, she realizes the wait was worth it as she now has the best pet in the world.

It’s an adorable story with an expected outcome, but The Best Pet Ever strikes an undeniable chord with anyone who’s ever wanted a pet as a child, as well as anyone who may have pet-minded children. The entire book has a very “timeless” quality, in that it can appeal to anyone from any time. Roberts never alludes to a particular time period in her writing, and Allwright’s illustrations contain no specific items or styles that can be categorized into any real date. It’s the kind of book that could have been appreciated one hundred years ago as well as one hundred years from now.

This agelessness contained within Deborah Allwright’s illustrations isn’t purely because of the content, however. The overall artistic style in The Best Pet Ever also has a very “modern retro” feel. In a way, Allwright’s drawings seem like a more modern take on the classic Dick and Jane-style imagery many are familiar with. The primarily pastel and (what I assume is) mixed media imagery is both serene and nostalgic, with some very vibrant color blends. However I believe the most notable aspect of these illustrations are Allwright’s use of texture.

On every page and in every drawing, it’s obvious that a lot of care has gone into the use of textures. The patterns on the little girl’s dress, the uniform dots (almost like newsprint) and other subtleties help to make each illustration “pop.” What’s even more interesting is the fact that many of these textures seem to derive from found objects (paper towels, sponges, etc…), almost as though it were Allwright’s intention to mirror that concept of appropriating miscellaneous objects literally into her drawings. These textures are used in a few unexpected and clever ways; such as paper towel patterns used for the shading of clouds, uniform dots used as highlights on a fishbowl and so on. It really serves to differentiate her style from a lot of other current picture books despite the fact that it’s all so subtle it could easily be missed in a cursory glance.

Victoria Roberts was the youngest of seven girls and had severe asthma to boot, so she wasn’t able to have any pets as a young girl. This lead to a lot imaginary pets and adventures, which were an obvious inspiration for her other books, including The Best Pet Ever, I’ve Finished (Caterpillar Books Ltd, 2008) and more. Deborah Allwright has illustrated several children’s’ books, and doesn’t show any sign of slowing down. Her drawings have been used for Hello! Is This Grandma? (Alison Green Books, 2007), The Night Pirates (Egmont Books Ltd, 2007), Dinosaur Starts School (Albert Whitman & Co, 2009) and Grunter (Templar Publishing, 2000) just to name a few. She’s currently working for a studio in London, England.

The Best Pet Ever is one of those titles that falls into the category of “instant classic.” The story is just vague enough to keep it relevant in any time period, and the illustrations can be appreciated by anyone. The little girl’s quirky nature, shown through the unique names she gives her “pets,” is sure to be enjoyed by parents and the children they’ll undoubtedly read this book to. The only thing Mom or Dad should be careful of is their own child’s kindled interest in acquiring a fluffy, feathered or scaly friend of their very own.

A Dog for Every Season

Filed under: Art, Books, Bookshelf, mp — site admin @ 7:38 am

dogs

Dogs

Written and illustrated by Emily Gravett

Reviewed by Rob Rich

No other animal in human history is considered a more iconic, more devoted or a more loving friend to mankind than the humble canine. Oh sure cats were considered as gods (and act like they still believe it), but they won’t intentionally cheer you up when you’ve had a bad day or play fetch. No, for that completely unconditional love and trust you’ll need a dog.

Emily Gravett’s Dogs (Simon & Schuster, 2009) isn’t exactly a novel concept seeing as books about dogs, dog breeds and dog adventures have been around ever since their wild ancestors were offered food, warmth and shelter in exchange for protection and companionship. However, what it lacks in overall originality it more than makes up for in presentation. At its core, Dogs is a book about the story’s narrator who (coincidentally) loves dogs. It’s not bogged down by exposition or prose, but rather makes the simple point that all dogs are loved.

While there certainly isn’t an overabundance of reading involved, the words themselves flow smoothly. The breaks in pacing and intentional repetitions are almost lyrical in nature. Big dogs, small dogs, hairy, bald, loud or quiet; virtually every type of dog is covered, and many individual breeds are visually represented. It becomes clear very quickly that the narrator is quite the fan of Man’s Favorite Quadruped. It’s a very cute story overall, with an even more adorable surprise at the end.

As easy to enjoy as Gravett’s story may be, what really allows it to stand out from the rest of the pack (pun intended) is the art. The beautiful watercolor and pencil illustrations, with some great use of shading, blending and line work, give each of the dogs their own sense of energy and vitality. This energy carries over from the technical to the playful as the various breeds interact with each other across every two-page spread.

Gravett’s depictions of these dogs as they chase, bound and tug across the pages serves to make her style stand out even further. Every single pup looks like it could jump off the page, and their features (both expressive and physical) perfectly straddle that difficult line between realism and caricature. From a Great Dane’s dopey-but-loving smile to a Poodle’s shocked look of disgust towards a fellow canine burrowing through garbage, each dog shows a little of their own personality through these perfectly captured moments.

Of course, Dogs isn’t Emily Gravett’s first book. Spells (Simon & Schuster, 2009), Wolves (Simon & Schuster, 2006), and Orange Pear Apple Bear (Simon & Schuster, 2007) are but a few of this award winning author/illustrator’s well-received works. She’s also won several awards for her work, including the Boston Globe-Horn Book Honor Award for Illustration, as well as the Kate Greenaway Medal (twice). She currently lives in Brighton, England with her partner, their daughter and their pet Saluki.

Dogs is really just a no-frills, fun and cute book. The story is worded simply enough to make is accessible to almost any reading level. The illustrations are memorable and are bound to elicit more than a few smiles and laughs. Overall it’s yet another example of just why Emily Gravett is such a celebrated (and decorated) author and illustrator.

4/3/2010

Angel of Death, Just a Man After All

Filed under: Books, Bookshelf, General, Reviews, Theater, mp — cindi @ 8:58 am

phantom

Phantom by Susan Kay

Reviewed by Cindi Di Marzo

Twenty years after publication, English novelist Susan Kay’s response to Gaston Leroux’s Le Fantôme de l’Opéra ranks among the most powerful portraits of one of the most psychologically complex characters in literature.1 Owing in part to its rarity, Kay’s novel Phantom (1990) has acquired cult status. Although in wide circulation in the 1990s, today Kay’s story is available in expensive editions from small publishers and in used copies from out-of-print booksellers.

Comparatively few readers own copies of Leroux’s book, yet the Phantom’s story is well known throughout the world from recreations in books, film and theater; the 1925 film starring Lon Chaney and Andrew Lloyd Webber’s 1986 musical have become classics. In fact, the English composer’s theater adaptation has earned the fine distinction of longest-running Broadway show in history.2 In her Author’s Note, Kay briefly mentions the wide range of sources informing her version of Erik’s story, including Chaney, and Michael Crawford in the original London cast (1986).3 In the final analysis, Kay judges a 1967 full-length cartoon to be most faithful to Leroux’s vision.

Beyond her insightful panoramic view of Erik’s inner and outer landscapes, Kay’s brilliance can be traced to hundreds of minute details rendering Erik a sympathetic figure, without shying from his volcanic rage and unquenchable thirst for revenge. With his goliath-like physical strength, intellect rivaling Einstein and Hawking, musical genius and unnerving skills as magician and thief, Erik comes off as a flesh-and-blood human being needing, as we all do, acceptance and love.

After escaping while still a child from his mother’s deeply wounding care, Erik travels the world, acquires great wealth, erects monumental buildings, and produces an array of inventions variously futuristic and simple that heal, destroy or merely lend convenience. He makes a few friends, men who admire his talents yet fear the truth behind his mask, which they believe covers a depraved soul. To some he reveals the extent of his depravity by confessing the many murders he has committed (some in self defense, others to assuage his burden of grief and guilt). Mostly, Erik acquires enemies who mock, taunt and tease.

Given the scope of Kay’s novel, readers might be surprised to learn that her epic journey to the heart of the Phantom took only eighteen months to complete. Referring to Leroux’s novel, Kay says:

“The little black book began to live on my bedside table, and I returned again and again to those passages which intrigued and puzzled me. Increasingly, I found my attention drawn to the final three pages, to the brief historical outline in which Leroux accounts for the Phantom’s earlier existence.”

Since Leroux’s work and all subsequent adaptations chronicle a six-month period preceding the Phantom’s death at approximately age 50, Kay decided to uncover his past from birth to ruler of the Paris Opera’s labyrinthine underworld.

Kay sections her novel into first-person narratives offering varying viewpoints of Erik and the characters’ experiences with him, including two sections related by Erik himself. Erik’s vain and spoiled widowed mother Madeleine speaks of the years from birth (1831) to his departure from her home (1840); Erik picks up the tale, describing his mother’s often harsh, mostly indifferent treatment of him to explain the desperation leading to his incarceration as an exhibit in a traveling gypsy show. By this time, Erik has learned to expect torment and abuse from his fellow humans. Escaping to Rome, his precocious knowledge of architecture attracts an elderly Italian stonemason named Giovanni; thus, Erik’s history resumes in Giovanni’s words. Next, readers hear from chief of police Nadir of the years Erik spends in Persia as favorite of an easily manipulated shah and the dominatrix who is his mother-in-law. Erik’s shock when shown kindness and his tenderness toward animals, orphans and abused creatures cannot fail to move readers. Kay’s concluding sections are told by, again, Erik as he works as a contractor in Belgium, then returns to Paris; Christine Daae, Swedish soprano at the Paris Opera; and her childhood friend and suitor, Raoul.

Although at this point Kay deals with a history written by Leroux, not surprisingly she adds layers of depth and possibility to Erik’s biography. For example, upon returning to Paris, Erik laments radical changes obscuring the chaotic beauty of a city he loves. In his voice, Kay tells readers:

“The romantic old city which I had once explored as a wide-eyed fugitive boy–the variegated Paris of Voltaire and Desmoulins–was being swept into oblivion beneath the hands of the emperor and his grand prefect, Baron Haussmann.”

Consisting of wide-open, uniform spaces, Haussmann’s aesthetics appall Erik. Heartbroken by arriving too late to participate in a competition to design and build an opera house for Paris, he forces himself on the winner, Charles Garnier (1825-1898). Together, they develop mutual admiration and respect as co-workers and wary friends. But just as the 2,200-seat Neo-Baroque structure begins to take shape, the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871) and civil unrest further threaten the old city and their masterpiece.

Disfigured from birth, Erik has spent his life searching for unspoiled beauty and perfect love. Conflicted himself, Kay’s Phantom expects people to be faithful, true and kind. Never satisfied with their behavior or his own, Erik spirals into depression, delusion and addiction. As others have mocked him, he mocks himself in what he considers to be his magnum opus, a musical score called Don Juan Triumphant. Kay connects Erik’s obsessive love for Christine to tragic tales he tells her in his underground sanctuary (Oscar Wilde’s The Nightingale and the Rose, for instance), as well as to operas performed on the stage above them (Faust, Aïda).

Remembering the Angel of Music conjured by her father, Christine identifies Erik as her promised guide and support. Fragile, innocent and remarkably naive, Christine discovers his dark side and flees from this Angel of Death. But for the mass market, love, however dark and futile, prevails. In the end, Kay’s novel triumphs as popular entertainment that will keep readers enthralled for many more decades. Twenty years down the line, Kay’s own magnum opus is worth savoring and revisiting when “reality,” with all of it horrors, makes one wish the world away.

1 French writer Gaston Leroux’s Le Fantôme de l’Opéra was serialized in Le Gaulois from September 23, 1909, to January 8, 1910, before being issued in a single volume. Poor initial reception to the book resulted in out-of-print status for periods during the twentieth century.

2 Andrew Lloyd Webber’s sequel to his Phantom of the Opera, Love Never Dies, is currently playing in London and set to open in New York in fall 2010.

3 Crawford’s portrayal has left indelible marks on public conception of the Phantom. After three and a half years and more than 1,300 performances of the show, on April 29, 1990, Crawford bowed out of the role.

Happy Is…Where Happy Lives

Filed under: Biographies, Books, Bookshelf, mp — cindi @ 8:49 am

bliss

The Geography of Bliss: One Grump’s Search for the Happiest Places in the World by Eric Weiner (Twelve paperback edition, 2009)

Reviewed by Cindi Di Marzo

“One always begins to forget a place as soon as it’s left behind,” according to Charles Dickens. The eminent Victorian filled his novels with characters who know their share of misery, much of it tied to the places in which they live. From the penny-pinching scrooge to Oliver’s fellows in the orphanage, Dickens pretty well covered the field of misery in Victorian London. It isn’t difficult to imagine that they would gladly leave it and memories of it behind. But some of Dickens’s most memorable characters rise above their conditions to embrace a happiness seldom traceable to a change in circumstances or amnesia; rather, it comes either from an intrinsically contented nature or a change of heart.

In The Geography of Bliss, National Public Radio commentator Eric Weiner discovers that, perhaps, Dickens might not have been as spot-on about memory as he was about humanity. Clearly, the places where Weiner traveled and lived as NPR foreign correspondent left a lasting impression and vast field of inquiry to explore: the potential for happiness in residents of markedly different countries.

Entwined as it is with political, economic, social, religious and philosophical systems and personal beliefs, happiness is a slippery concept. Weiner traveled to 10 countries to pin it down. Naturally, the first stop any self-respecting journalist would make is the Netherlands, home of the World Database of Happiness. Run by what Weiner the humorist describes as a “Dutch Robin Williams,” the WDH churns out statistics drawn from happiness studies. Here, Weiner learns important lessons. Joy does not result from seemingly unlimited freedom and the security promised by a socialist agenda. More disappointing to Weiner, happiness can be reduced to a number in a database. Fortunately, this somewhat discouraging beginning merely whets Weiner’s investigative instincts. In fact, it sets him and readers on a wild quest in search of bliss.

Early on, Weiner dispenses with simple solutions; gobs of money and air conditioning in Qatar do not produce happy citizens; an end to Soviet rule did not release Moldova from the doldrums; crippling cold and darkness cannot squelch Icelanders’ ability to find happiness in failure; and unparalleled levels of comfort and convenience do not appear to have aided Americans in their constitutionally granted pursuit of happiness. But there are some simple ingredients in the happiness recipe, commonly promoted by what he calls the “self-help industrial complex”: family, community, spirituality and trust. One less obvious influence, culture, turns out to be critical. For example, Weiner’s chapters on Qatar and Moldova suggest that lack or obliteration of a homogenous culture (or, in the cases of Qatar and America, a superficial culture) chips away at personal happiness. Regarding Iceland, Weiner says:

“Icelandand this is the part that is truly mind-blowing–is inventing its culture now. As you read these words, some Icelandic musician is composing the quintessential Icelandic song. So far, no such thing exists. There is no tradition of instrumental music in Iceland. It was too cold and dark back then to bother, or maybe the ancient Icelanders were too drunk at the time. So young Islanders are deciding for themselves what is quintessentially Icelandic. It is a wonderful thing to watch. To be present at the moment of creation.”

By the time they reach these words, many readers will have begun to wonder where creativity figures in the happiness equation. Although Weiner does not expand upon creativity as typically conceived, in his chapter on Iceland, literally, he hits the tip of an iceberg. Icelanders’ love of their language is a major component of the glue that holds them together. It makes them a bunch of frequently intoxicated but nevertheless happy poets. Similarly, language in Thailand plays a role in that country’s buoyancy. The phrase mai pen rai (”it is nothing” or “never mind”) evokes a truth often spoken by Weiner’s happiest subjects; thinking registers as a serious threat to personal and collective joy. And like the Inuit, who use many terms for the word snow to convey subtle distinctions, the Thai language includes multiple phrases for the act of smiling. Self-professed Eeyore-ish Weiner’s favorite is yim mai awk (”I’m-trying-to-smile-but-can’t smile”). In Thailand, the language of smile is a complex window into the Thai character. Leaving Thailand at the start of a short-lived military coup, Weiner is convinced that the “don’t worry, be happy” philosophy will prevail.

It won’t take American readers long to understand that Weiner’s journey mirrors their own as citizens with a birthright of happiness. In order to achieve it, one must do as Weiner has done; define what it means to pursue happiness, as well as the state in which one qualifies as a happy person. Is it muddling through with a stiff upper lip, as do the Brits, never appearing weak or in need? Or is it giving up all desires, greed, envy and lust like buddhists in Bhutan, where the king has declared a policy of Gross National Happiness to counter the industrialized world’s fixation with Gross National Product? Weiner admits to sharing a commonly held view of the Himalayas as Shangri-La, derived from his reading of James Hilton’s 1933 novel Lost Horizon, well-known to high school and college students and fans of Frank Capra’s 1937 film adaptation. (A 1957 movie musical with Charles Boyer, John Gielgud and Liv Ullmann and 1956 musical comedy are other dramatizations.) A consideration of Hilton’s novel follows this review.

Weiner’s interviews with expatriates to Bhutan, a tiny country located high in the Himalayas between Tibet to the north and India to the south, confirm impressions from college days. One can be happy in an isolated oasis like Bhutan. Likewise, expatriates to the other visited countries weigh in on happiness quotients, the natives’ and their own. Contradictions abound, but in the remaining two destinations/chapters Weiner deftly pulls together his observations: India, a land founded on and completely comfortable with contradiction, and his homeland, America, where angst-ridden white male European philosophers and Freud have led generations to think as obsessively as they work.

The Geography of Bliss is just too good to miss. Weiner’s ironic, self-deprecating humor spices up ponder-ready wisdom and practical advice. As a road map of happiness, Weiner’s book is a trove of insights and tools to help readers unearth little gifts of joy wherever they live.

losthorizon

Happiness is Letting Go: Lost Horizon by James Hilton

Outwardly simple in plot and format, James Hilton’s now-classic view of a mountain-top Eden called Shangri-La ranks in many college students’ minds with Herman Hesse’s Siddhartha. Perhaps it is ironic that young adults who first read these books in high school and college are deeply affected by Hilton’s and Hesse’s novels, as they describe world-weary characters for whom spent youthful passions have left a void where wisdom might grow. This resonance suggests a human need, present even in those who have yet to revel in the world’s earthy delights, for stillness and refined beauty. In an age when recognition on the global stage requires being large, loud and ubiquitous, the definition of Art has become cloudier and more subjective than ever. For Hilton’s main character, 37-year-old English diplomat Robert “Glory” Conway, peace and stillness are pre-requisite for creation and preservation of genuine beauty. Between the two world wars, he and three companions are hijacked, or more accurately “spirited away,” from China to the mountains between northern India and Tibet. There, Conway discovers that the treacherous mountain landscape, lush valley and idyllic lamasery sheltering them discourage his typically half-hearted participation in modern life.

Dubbed a war hero, the well-educated Conway had taught at Oxford University and, in hindsight, believes that the quiet, scholarly life better suited his nature. Yet that, too, left him uneasy. Coming as it does between his return to England to become foreign secretary and his last assignment in China, evacuating nearly 100 Western residents of the Chinese city of Baskul during a revolution, the hijacking provides, Conway deems, a necessary interruption in his meaningless life. Within the walls of the lamasery, surrounded by beautiful objects and treated with highly cultivated, dispassionate courtesy, Conway finds a balm that begins to heal his wartime devastation.

Hilton bookends his fantastic tale with prologue and epilogue in the voice of the novel’s narrator, Woodford Green, who has met with a group of classmates from his Oxford days. Between these, Hilton places the bulk of his story as a manuscript written by one of Green’s Oxford chums, a novelist named Rutherford who found Conway recovering in a mission hospital at Chung-Kiang. The manuscript accounts for Conway’s disappearance after the evacuation, through his time at the lamasery, later discovery in Chung-Kiang and subsequent vanishing from a ship traveling from Japan to San Francisco.

The effect of the lamasery on Conway’s traveling companions amplifies the inclinations it reveals in him: A junior civil servant named Mallinson rages against his forced captivity in Eden; a jovial American businessman plans to enjoy the lamasery’s gracious hospitality for as long as possible; and a female missionary snatches at a chance to convert the inhabitants. Eventually, as the pulls of the modern world become a distant memory, the American and missionary envision remaining indefinitely, while Conway decides that this place, which cannot be located on a map and from which few have traveled to the outside, offers the only peace he will ever know. Hilton demonstrates just how easy it is for Conway to let go of his old life. As the days unwind more slowly, the urge to ”do” grows fainter.

The shocking revelations of the lamasery’s history and age of its residents vouchsafed to him alone by the High Lama merely confirm Conway’s own impressions; rather than fear Shangri-La’s isolation like Mallinson, or seek to breech it like the missionary, or take advantage of it like the American, Conway embraces it. Rutherford’s manuscript explains that:

“It was not so much any individual thing that attracted him as the gradual revelation of elegance, of modest and impeccable taste, of harmony so fragrant that it seemed to gratify the eye without arresting it. Only indeed by a conscious effort did he recall himself from the artist’s mood to the connoisseur’s, and then he recognized treasures that museums and millionaires alike would have bargained for, exquisite pearl blue Sung ceramics, paintings in tinted inks preserved for more than a thousand years, lacquers in which the cold and lovely detail of fairyland was not so much depicted as orchestrated.”

By this point, Conway understand that bargaining between museums and millionaires defiles art works; crude behaviors fueled by emotions and base desires threaten noble human dignity as exemplified by his elderly guide at the lamasery and a young, musically gifted woman, both aspirants to lamahood. Since it appeared, admiration for Hilton’s novel has led many people to ponder the location of his lost paradise; some have tried to reach it; and a few have made it a lifelong quest. Weiner may have come close when he landed in Bhutan. But it doesn’t matter whether or where Shangri-La exists, what happened to Conway after he disappeared for the second time, or if the high lama’s testimony to miraculous happenings in the Himalayas contains truth. Hilton grants us a vision of Art, Wisdom, Peace and Stillness set against the music of the spheres. This vision remains as water for the seeds of beauty inside us that grow just a little bit more each time we glimpse Eden.

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress